How can FIFA enforce agent rules? CAS panel overturns agent suspension in Beckett v FIFA case

The recent arbitral award delivered by a Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) panel in CAS 2024/A/10918 Jonathan Dominic Finbar Beckett v. FIFA[1] (Award) sheds light on the challenges involved in implementing new regulatory frameworks in international sport. The case provides a timely opportunity to consider the effects of the implementation of global sports regulations, and in particular, the uncertainty, regulatory gaps and enforcement issues that may arise due to wider legal challenges.
The case concerned Jonathan Beckett, a football agent whose FIFA licence was provisionally suspended by the FIFA General Secretariat in September 2024 for allegedly providing agent services without proper authorisation. However, the decision arose during an unusual regulatory situation: Article 21 of the FIFA Football Agent Regulations (FFAR), which grants the FIFA Disciplinary Committee authority to make final decisions on agent violations, had been temporarily suspended by FIFA. This created a legal gap where the FIFA General Secretariat could investigate potential violations and impose provisional suspensions, but no FIFA body had the power to make definitive rulings or impose final sanctions. The CAS panel was therefore required to determine whether the General Secretariat could effectively impose what became a 16-month suspension without the matter ever being referred to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee for a proper adjudication.
This article highlights the broader implications of the award for sports governing bodies to bear in mind when suspending or delaying regulations —particularly in transitional periods where procedural certainty and athlete/agent rights may be at stake. This is because even when practical difficulties arise – such as when disciplinary powers are temporarily suspended – governing bodies cannot merge investigative and decision-making powers unless the applicable regulations expressly permit it.
The article looks at:
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | FIFA | FIFA Disciplinary Committee | FIFA Football Agent Regulations | FIFA General Secretariat
Related Articles
- A Guide to the new FIFA Agent Regulations For Football Agents & Clubs
- Understanding FIFA’s Agents’ Regulations - Experts’ Discussion
- Can a football player negotiate with another agent while under an exclusive representation agreement?
- Football agents (PROFAA) v FIFA – CAS’s biggest EU competition law decision yet?
- An Introduction To The AIFF Football Agents Regulations 2023
- How FIFA’s Agent Regulations approach contractual stability & just cause, compared to FIFA RSTP
- The end of the FIFA Agents Cap and the beginning of a less restrained standard of competition review in sport?
- Regulating the Regulators: Competition Law Takes on FIFA’s Agent Rules
Written by
Rahim Hirji
Rahim is an Associate in the Commercial team at Onside Law. Prior to joining Onside, Rahim trained and qualified at Charles Russell Speechlys, and has also worked in-house.