Skip to main content

Litigation privilege hammered? Key points for sports organisations on the scope of litigation privilege from the West Ham Stadium case

Westham Stadium in sunset
Friday, 15 March 2019 Author: Tom Rudkin

The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in WH Holding & West Ham United Football Club Limited v E20 Stadium LLP1 has occupied significant column space on the websites of solicitors' firms and barristers' chambers. This is for good reason, as the decision has a significant restrictive impact on the scope of litigation privilege. Notwithstanding the case's far-reaching significance, it is particularly important for sports organisations to be aware of given the variety of legal proceedings in which they are involved and in relation to which they may seek to withhold documents on the grounds of litigation privilege. This article reviews the case and identifies the key lessons for sports organisations when considering litigation privilege.

To continue reading or watching login or register here

Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Related Articles

Written by

Tom Rudkin

Tom Rudkin

Tom is a leading reputation, media and information lawyer, and a Partner at Farrer & Co.  He advises the firm’s clients on all issues relating to their reputation, privacy, confidential information and data. Tom advises individuals, companies and other institutions on all aspects of reputation management, whether it is responding to mainstream media coverage, protecting online reputation, dealing with defamation or harassment.  Consistent with the team's ethos, Tom's work is very diverse and he firmly believes in taking a holistic approach to protecting clients' reputations.

 

Upcoming Events

Risk & Insurance in Sport 2025

Risk & Insurance in Sport 2025
11-09-2025 10:30 -17:00

Global Summit 2025

Global Summit 2025
06-10-2025 9:00 - 07-10-2025 17:00