Regulating Against Competition Manipulation In Sport

Financial pressures caused by the COVID-19 pandemic threaten to increase the incidence of competition manipulation (fixing) in sport. It is critical that sports governing bodies (SGBs) and event organisers understand this risk and have in place effective regulations to prohibit competition manipulation and other behaviours that undermine the perceived integrity (or unpredictability) of sport.
This article examines key considerations for SGBs and event organisers undertaking those exercises and assesses the utility of the Macolin Convention and Olympic Movement Code on the Prevention of the Manipulation of Competitions as resources for doing so. Specifically, it looks at:
- The responsibilities on SGBs and event organisers to regulate against competition manipulation
- The current international regulatory frameworks:
- The Macolin Convention
- Olympic Movement Code
- How to assess a sport’s relative risk to manipulation
- The four key prohibited behaviours under the Macolin Convention
- manipulation of sports competitions;
- participant betting;
- misuse of inside information; and,
- failure to report.
- Other behaviours that should also be prohibited
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Anti-Corruption | Betting | Council of Europe | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | COVID-19 | Cricket | European Union (EU) | EUROPOL | Football | Gambling | Integrity | International Olympic Committee (IOC) | INTERPOL | Macolin Convention | Malta | Match Manipulation | Olympic Movement Code | Olympics | Tennis | United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
Related Articles
- Can suspicious betting alerts prove match fixing? The case of KS Skënderbeu v UEFA
- The role of Information Sharing Agreements in tackling corruption and doping in sport
- Why ‘national platforms’ are the cornerstone in the fight against match-fixing in sport: the Macolin Convention
- Establishing the optimum sports betting regulatory system to protect the integrity of Indian sports
- Tackling match-fixing in Switzerland: the new duties on International Sports Federations to monitor & report suspected match manipulations
Written by
Oliver Harland
Oliver is a Managing Associate at Northridge specialising in litigation and contentious regulatory matters. Oliver’s experience includes acting for the governing bodies of tennis (ITF, ATP, WTA and Grand Slams) in relation to an independent review of integrity in tennis and The FA in relation to an independent review of alleged non-recent child sexual abuse in football and concurrent civil claims.