Copyright © LawInSport Limited 2010 - 2025. These pages contain general information only. Nothing in these pages constitutes legal advice. You should consult a suitably qualified lawyer on any specific legal problem or matter. The information provided here was accurate as of the day it was posted; however, the law may have changed since that date. This information is not intended to be, and should not be used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. LawInSport is not responsible for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this information. Please refer to the full terms and conditions on our website.
Balancing stakeholder interest in Women’s football - a commentary on the Carney Review
Women’s football is firmly in the spotlight this summer. Following a record-breaking 2022/23 English domestic season, where viewership and live audiences for the Women’s Super League (“WSL”) hit an all time high, the expanded World Cup format on display in Australia and New Zealand showcased the ever-increasing quality and strength in depth of the women’s game[1]. Despite losing out to Spain in the final, the Lionesses have captured the interest of the nation. This is borne out by the TV figures for the final, with a reported 14.4 million tuning in across the BBC and ITV - a record TV audience in the UK for a Women's World Cup final[2].
While all signs point towards a bright future for women’s football in England and beyond, the sport is still at a nascent stage. There remain clear opportunities for improvement and growth.
For example, the row over the value of broadcast rights to show the 2023 World Cup meant that there was a real risk that the tournament would not be shown on TV in the UK (and elsewhere), with threats of a media blackout in key jurisdictions less than two months before the opening match[3]. Fortunately, a deal was struck with the BBC and ITV just 5 weeks out from the start of the tournament – unlike in Japan (who also have a strong pedigree in women’s football), where an agreement was not reached until the opening day. Clearly, it is important that the commercial value of women’s football is properly recognised – but so is the visibility of the most important tournament on the football calendar. There is a similar impasse regarding bonus payments and commercial arrangements for the Lionesses which, as widely reported, differ starkly to their male counterparts[4].
In this mixed context of great potential and challenge, the publication of former England international Karen Carney MBE’s report, Raising the Bar – Reframing the Opportunity in Women’s Football (“Review”) in July 2023, is broadly seen as a positive step at a key time for the game[5]. The Review seeks to provide the vision and direction to realise the potential and take the women’s game in England to the next level.
In this article, we summarise some of the key findings of the Review and share our take on what it means for women’s football.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
Hits 3949 Posted in Sports | Athlete Welfare | Blogs | Football | Articles | Squire Patton Boggs
Related Articles
Written by
Katie Smith
Katie Smith is an associate in the Litigation Practice in the London office of Squire Patton Boggs.
Lucy Webster
Lucy Webster is a Partner at global law firm Squire Patton Boggs, where she co-leads its dedicated women’s sport group. Lucy is recognised particularly for her work in sports, media and ESG. Lucy advises on strategic and legal risk and is an expert in complex cross-border disputes, including in the CAS. Lucy also advises high-profile clients on reputational risk and management, including as a material factor in the strategic direction of commercial interests.