10 key considerations arising from Kaneria
In our last blog (Cricket disciplinary appeal is an Arbitration) we we discussed in detail the Commercial Court ruling that Pakistani international bowler, Danish Kaneria’s appeal proceedings against his life time ban for involvement in spot-fixing under the ECB’s Disciplinary Regulations are an “arbitration” for the purposes of the Arbitration Act 1996. Here are at least 10 key considerations arising from England and Wales Cricket Board Limited v Kaneria [2013] EWHC 1074 (Comm):
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Arbitration | Cricket | United Kingdom (UK)
Related Articles
- Lie detectors and sports arbitration - an uncertain future
- The Twenty20 challenge
- Sky Sports resorts to off-tube commentary following fall out with BCCI
- Pakistani cricketers’ Appeals heard at CAS - watch this space
- Competition authorities raise the umpire’s finger against the BCCI
- Asif and Kaneria: former Pakistani cricketers make legal history : Part 1
- Cricket disciplinary appeal is an Arbitration
Written by
Nick De Marco KC
Nick is rated a leading silk in Sports Law and is a member of Blackstone Chambers.
He has advised and acted for a number of sports governing bodies, athletes, most Premier League football clubs and many world-class football players in commercial and regulatory disputes.
