How to value football players? Lessons from Newell’s Old Boys v AS Roma CAS Decision

This article discusses a recent CAS decision which highlighted different and competing methodologies that can be utilised when valuing football players. The case deals with a dispute over an alleged circumvention by a football club of a sell-on clause agreed in a transfer agreement.
The decision is interesting as it shows the difficulty in applying objective criteria to a subjectively valued and open market transaction.
Article Highlights
- Introduction
- Facts
- FIFA PSC Decision
- Appeal before CAS
- Methodologies for valuing a football player
- Considerations of the Sole Arbitrator
- Conclusion
Introduction
The summer registration period in 2023 witnessed football clubs across the world spend a record total of USD 7.36bn in transfer fees.[1] Such fees generate passionate debate among fans and the press in relation to the value of the players transferring. Transfer compensation paid or sought is dependent on a number of factors, such as the age of a player, the remaining term of a contract, the position of the player and the needs of the respective clubs involved.
Newer and more stringent financial regulations (the Profit and Sustainability Rules (“PSR”) of the English Premier League being one ruleset which has generated a lot of speculation in relation to its impact on transfers) have led to heightened commentary of what football player’s ‘value’ is. The PSR reporting deadline resulted in commentary in respect of a number of ‘convenient’ transactions taking place in June. These factors, applicable legislation and more inform the negotiations and the eventual compensation paid.
While the total spend in the 2024 summer registration period is reported to be lower[2],[3] the focus on the sums paid and the structure of deals has heightened, as clubs, players and agents navigate an increasingly complex regulatory landscape. There are, naturally, a number of disputes resulting from every registration period, entailing a number of problems in establishing the so-called ‘market’ or ‘fair’ value of a player whose transfer results in a dispute.
An interesting CAS decision (in the case CAS 2020/A/7612 Club Atlético Newell’s Old Boys v. AS Roma and the FIFA decision which preceded it[4]), highlights the competing methodologies utilised in the valuation of football players and the difficulties in applying objective criteria to a subjectively valued, open market, transaction.
This CAS decision is available here and the FIFA Player Status Committee (“PSC”) is available here.
Please note that the authors acted for AS Roma in this case and the preceding FIFA matter.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Argentina | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | Dispute Resolution | FIFA | FIFA Regulation on Status and Transfer of Players (FIFA RSTP) | Football | Italy | Player Transfers | Sell-On Clause | Transfer Agreements
Related Articles
- The need for FIFA to ensure that football federations set up National Dispute Resolution Chambers
- Swiss Federal Tribunal rules on clause excluding FIFA & CAS jurisdiction through footballer’s employment contract
- Olympic drone drama: How FIFA sanctioned the Canadian women’s football team for spying
- The evolution of betting and match-fixing regulation in Italian football – key regulations and cases
- Growth in multi-club ownership: Is it time to strengthen global regulations?
- Navigating dispute resolution for technical directors in football
- Advocate General questions whether FIFA Regulations are compliant with EU Law
Written by
Ian Laing
Ian is an associate at Lombardi Associates. He is a solicitor, qualified in Scotland, and in 2022 received his commission as a Writer to His Majesty’s Signet. Ian was the first Trainee Solicitor in the 500 plus years history of the Society of Writers to His Majesty’s Signet (The WS Society) with his traineeship providing a secondment to Lombardi Association, where he has remained since.
Ian works on a variety of matters for clients across the globe, ranging from transfer contracts, transfer negotiations and employment contracts to disciplinary matters before CAS, FIFA, UEFA, UK Anti-Doping and other regulatory and disciplinary bodies. In addition to this, recent work has involved advising both clubs and investors on investment into football clubs and advising start ups looking to enter the football space.
Elena La Ficara
Elena is a First-Class honours Sports Law & Sports Business graduate from UCFB Wembley, currently undertaking a master’s in Law & Professional Practice at King’s College London. Aspiring to become a sports lawyer, Elena has gained practical experience through involvement in the LawInSport mentoring scheme and an internship at Lombardi Associates. She has further made notable contributions to the field through several publications on sports law. Her fields of interest include Contract Law, EU Law and dispute resolution.