Key case law on attempts to circumvent FIFA’s Training Compensation System
In the words of the Court of Arbitration for Sport ("CAS"), the rationale for FIFA’s Training Compensation System (TCS) is, ‘that clubs should be encouraged to train players and those clubs that carry out the training process successfully should be rewarded for their efforts. By the same token, those other clubs that enjoy the fruits of that process should be obliged to pay something in compensation for the training efforts engaged in by others.’1
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Contract Law | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | FIFA | FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber | FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players | FIFA Training Compensation System | Football | Governance | Regulation
Related Articles
- Training compensation in football
- Sheffield United FC win FIFA training compensation case
- What is a “bridge transfer” in football
- The on-going football dispute over training compensation and player loans: Panionios -v- Parana
- Football player contracts - waiving training compensation
Written by
Markus Manninen
Markus is an attorney focused on commercial litigation and arbitration as well as sports law at the Finnish law firm Hannes Snellman Attorneys (Helsinki). He serves as a CAS arbitrator.
