Bullying In The Weighing Room – Will Bryony Frost's Case Mark A Sea Change For Sports?

The willingness and capability of sports governing bodies (SGBs) to tackle discrimination and harassment in sport has long been topical. The case of English National Hunt jockey, Bryony Frost, is the latest in that long line, and there is cause for optimism that things may be changing.
This article considers the determining factors in Frost’s case, how it compares to that which came before it, and what it might mean for the future of horse racing and sport more broadly. Specifically, it looks at:
- The facts
- The first instance Decision
- The Appeal
It then continues to analyse both the panels' decisions and what can be taken from the case overall, looking at the impact of cultural norms and procedural unfairness, and whether the whole incident demonstrates changing attitudes and progress in tackling discrimination in horseracing and sports more broadly.
A copy of the British Horseracing Authority’s (BHA) Independent Disciplinary Panel’s decision is available here[1]. Louis Weston of Outer Temple Chambers acted for the BHA.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Athlete Welfare | Bulling | Discrimination | Dispute Resolution | Horse Racing
Related Articles
- Dr. Eva Carneiro's claims against Chelsea and Jose Mourinho: breaking down the legal issues
- Key difficulties lawyers can face when trying to settle high profile sports employment disputes
- The Azeem Rafiq Case: How Sports Can Better Tackle Player Discrimination
- Personal Injury in Horseracing: Court Finds Jockey Guilty of Reckless Disregard For Safety
- In Conversation with Sohail Ali & Gurpreet Duhra on discrimination in cricket and law - E128