Match-fixing and the rights of individual sports participants: The Stephen Lee appeal
In September of this year Stephen Lee, a former world number five, was banned for 12 years for the fixing of seven snooker matches, including his first round match at the 2009 world snooker championships. The sole member of the disciplinary tribunal, Adam Lewis QC, a very distinguished and eminent sports lawyer, found that three groups of gamblers had made a total profit of nearly £100,000 from bets placed on Lee.1
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Horseracing | Match-Fixing | Snooker | United Kingdom (UK)
Related Articles
- What does the future hold for alcohol sponsorship of major sporting events?
- BASL September update: sporting integrity revisited
- Should we be comfortably satisfied with the standard of proof for match-fixing?
Written by
Jack Anderson
Jack Anderson is a Professor of Law at the University of Melbourne. He has published extensively on sports law, and most recently A Concise Introduction to Sports Law (Edward Elgar, 2024).
He is a member of World Athletics’ Disciplinary Tribunal and the integrity unit of the International Hockey Federation. He is an Ethics Commissioner for the International Tennis Federation and World Boxing. Jack is an arbitrator on Football Australia’s National Dispute Resolution Chamber, the National Sports Tribunal of Australia, and Sport Resolutions UK.
