Formula 1® financing: an analysis of how Caterham and Marussia entered administration
As we approach the final race of a turbulent Formula 1® season, this article explores recent off-track events in Formula 1 and in particular the fall of Caterham and Marussia into administration. The article reviews the relevant insolvency law and attempts to explain how the teams came to enter administration and the effect of administration on their stakeholders. It also explores how suppliers to Formula 1® teams may protect themselves.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Administration | Corporate Law | Finance | Formula 1 | Governance | Liquidation | Motorsport | Regulation
Related Articles
- Raising finance for Formula 1 teams: pros and cons of a Resource Restriction Agreement
- 2014 technical regulations for F1® racing have affected the competitive balance between factory and customer teams
- Caterham redundancies and the unlikely connection between employment and libel law
- How new safety car protocols could make Formula 1® safer
Written by
Richard Palmer
Richard Palmer is a Senior Associate at Hill Dickinson LLP in Manchester and has advised lenders, insolvency practitioners, creditors and other stakeholders in connection with restructuring and insolvency matters since qualifying in 2009.
