Skip to main content

A detailed review of the CAS Panel’s decision in WADA v Sun Yang & FINA

Swimmer Underwater
Thursday, 05 March 2020 Author: Jack Anderson

In a decision first announced[1] on 28 February 2020 the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) confirmed that Sun Yang would be banned from competitive swimming for eight years. His swimming future now rests largely on one final avenue of appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal. 

On 4 March, CAS released the Panel’s full, reasoned decision, a copy of which is available here[2]. This article reviews the decision and analyses its potential implications.  Specifically, it looks at:

  • The reasoned decision
    • The conduct of the sample collection personnel
    • Sun Yang’s intention to interfere and reliance on entourage
  • Sanction
  • Comment
    • Appeal to Swiss Federal Tribunal
    • Lessons for FINA

For background reading on the facts and the legal arguments made at the hearing, please see this article by the author: A detailed analysis of the legal arguments in WADA v Sun Yang & FINA - a very public hearing[3].

To continue reading or watching login or register here

Already a member? Sign in

Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts.  Find out more here.

Related Articles

Written by

Jack Anderson

Jack Anderson

Jack Anderson is a Professor of Law at the University of Melbourne. He has published extensively on sports law, and most recently A Concise Introduction to Sports Law (Edward Elgar, 2024).

He is a member of World Athletics’ Disciplinary Tribunal and the integrity unit of the International Hockey Federation. He is an Ethics Commissioner for the International Tennis Federation and World Boxing. Jack is an arbitrator on Football Australia’s National Dispute Resolution Chamber, the National Sports Tribunal of Australia, and Sport Resolutions UK.