Why Leaving the Ice Early Cost Kyiv Capitals at CAS – Field of Play Doctrine Prevails

A recently published Arbitral Award by the Court of Arbitration for Sport confirmed a decision of the Disciplinary Committee of the Ice Hockey Federation of Ukraine against Hockey Club Kyiv Capitals (Kyiv Capitals). The appeal to the CAS had been brought by Kyiv Capitals in connection with a match during the 2023/2024 Ukrainian Men’s Ice Hockey Championship season.
This article examines the award which serves as a crucial reminder for clubs, athletes, and sports administrators about the consequences of abandoning matches in protest at refereeing decisions. The ruling has broader implications for all sports organizations in understanding when regulatory sanctions for match abandonment will be upheld by sports tribunals.
The full award is available here: CAS 2024/A/10449 Hockey Club Kyiv Capitals v. Ice Hockey Federation of Ukraine[1]
Article Outline
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
Related Articles
- The João Palhinha Case: Portugal’s Arbitration Court reviews on-field referee decisions
- What steps can sports organisations take to protect officials & athletes from online abuse?
- Balancing act: CAS challenges and the 'field of play' doctrine in Olympic gymnastics (Chiles & Maneca-Voinea cases)
- A summary of CAS Ad Hoc decisions at the Paris 2024 Summer Olympic Games
- How can FIFA enforce agent rules? CAS panel overturns agent suspension in Beckett v FIFA case
- What sports clubs should bear in mind when handling member disciplinary cases
Written by
Jonathan Mason
Jonathan is a trainee lawyer at Squire Patton Boggs.