FIFA's Transfer System 2027: A New Role for Collective Bargaining in Global Football?
On[1] 10 June 2026, FIFA and FIFPRO announced two landmark agreements[2] that will reshape the regulatory architecture of professional football: a comprehensive reform of the international transfer system, branded "Transfer System 2027,"[3] and a Memorandum of Understanding running until 2031 that formalises FIFPRO's role in FIFA governance[4].
Both stem directly from the Court of Justice of the European Union's October 2024 preliminary ruling in the FIFA v BZ (known as the Diarra case) which found core elements of the existing Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP), particularly Article 17 (termination of contract without just cause), incompatible with EU free movement and competition law.[5]
However, it must be noted that the full text of the agreements have not been published as on the date of publication.
While much of the commentary on these reforms has focussed on transfer fee-sharing for players and changes to compensation calculations, the most structurally significant change may be procedural rather than substantive: the creation of a Global Social Dialogue Platform, through which future amendments to the RSTP will be negotiated collectively between FIFA and recognised social partners, rather than imposed unilaterally by FIFA's Council.
This effectively imports, at a global level, a model of football governance that has existed in fragmented form across various domestic leagues for decades and invites a comparison with how collective bargaining already operates in football's major markets.
This article looks at:
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Australia | Collective Bargaining Agreement | Court of Justice of European Union | FIFA | FIFA Regulation on Status and Transfer of Players (FIFA RSTP) | FIFPRO | Football | France | New Zealand | Player Transfers | Spain | USA
Related Articles
- Advocate General questions whether FIFA Regulations are compliant with EU Law: Legal & factual context (Part 1)
- The impact of the Diarra case on the football transfer system – Key takeaways
- Transforming Transfers? How the CJEU reconsidered FIFA’s Transfer Rules in the Diarra case
- Diarra v FIFA: a game-changer for footballers’ employment rights?
- What Is the Real Impact of the CJEU’s Seraing Judgment on the Future of Sports Arbitration?
- Sports Disputes & Disciplinary Proceedings – Annual Review 2025/26
- The 2026 UEFA Business Case for Women's Football - Key Insights & Takeaways
Written by
Anthony Lo Surdo SC
Anthony Lo Surdo SC is an independent arbitrator, mediator and expert determiner practising from 8 Wentworth Chambers, Sydney; Lonsdale Chambers, Melbourne; and Arbitra International, London, Washington DC and Abu Dhabi.
A leading, internationally recognised sports law Silk, Anthony regularly sits as an arbitrator on international and domestic sport tribunals. His appointments include serving as an arbitrator and mediator with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (General and Football Lists), a member of the Football Australia (FA) Appeal Panel, Chair of the FA Disciplinary and Ethics Committee, Deputy Chair of the FA Dispute Resolution Chamber, Chair of the Football NSW Appeals Panel, and Senior Member of the National Sports Tribunal. He was recognised in the Lexology Index, Australia & New Zealand (2025) in the category of "Sports & Entertainment" and by the Lexology Global Index (2025) in the category of "Sports."
Anthony is a former member of the English FA Judiciary Panel and Sports Resolutions (UK) International Panel, and previously served as Disciplinary Counsel for the National Rugby League. He has also appeared as counsel for athletes and sports associations in anti-doping, disciplinary, regulatory and governance disputes.
