Match-fixing and the potential ‘Matuzalem effect’
Regular readers of my sports law blog will be aware of my strong feelings about the sanctions handed down to those found guilty of integrity offences, particularly for match-fixing.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
- Tags: Anti-Corruption | Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) | FIFA | Football | Integrity | Match-Fixing | Swiss Federal Supreme Court (FSC) | Switzerland | UEFA | World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)
Related Articles
- Should we be comfortably satisfied with the standard of proof for match-fixing?
- Match-fixing and the rights of individual sports participants: The Stephen Lee appeal
- Spain: First steps for coordinating measures against match fixing
- Summit held at IOC headquarters to discuss the fight against doping, match-fixing, illegal betting and good governance in the Olympic movement
Written by
Kevin Carpenter
Kevin is a advisor and member of the editorial board for LawInSport, having previously acted as editor.
Kevin specialises in integrity, regulatory, governance and disciplinary matters. His expertise and knowledge has led him to be engaged by major private and public bodies, including the IOC, FIFA, the Council of Europe, INTERPOL and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), as well as making regular appearances internationally delivering presentations and commenting in the media on sports law issues.
His research and papers are published across a variety of forums, including having a blog on LawInSport.
