INTERPOL Integrity in Sport Bi-Weekly Bulletin - 14 November - 27 November 2017
Nan Sato explains how player contract disputes are treated under Japanese labor law - Episode 56
Report from the first ISLJ Annual International Sports Law Conference
New mobile app to strengthen AFC’s fight against match-fixing
Building Momentum: The evolution of women’s wages In Australian Professional Team Sports
CAS cancels two fines imposed on the Mexican Football Federation and imposes warnings in their place
WADA Foundation Board takes important decisions that will significantly strengthen the Agency and the future of clean sport
FK Crvena zvezda (Illicit chants; stairways blocked; throwing of objects; improper conduct of the team), Decision of 16 November 2017, UEFA Decision
Circumstances of the case
The stairways were blocked in the North sector, and after the final whistle when visiting players and coaches were leaving, between 15 and 20 lighters and one bottle were thrown against the tunnel - No one was hit. There was chanting from the home-supporters between the 28th and 32nd minute: UEFA is mafia. Finally, six cautions were awarded against to FK Crvena Zvezda. With regard to the blocking of stairways, the club stresses that it occurred only on one tribune, a tradition of the hard core fans and no intervention was done as a prevention of possible potential safety and security unrest. Regarding the throwing of objects, the club notes that it took all possible measures to prevent supporters from taking items inside the stadium and that the high number of spectators put together with the isolated incident and with a low number of objects thrown should speak for the efficiency of these measures. Finally, as regards the UEFA Mafia chant, the clubs stresses that it´s not illicit due to the fact that UEFA can’t be the damaged party and the judge at the same time, stressing that supporters might be unaware of the possible negative consequences for their. Finally, the club argues that UEFA itself is also more-and-more aware of the fact that, it is subject to some critical voices raised by supporters and that it would be simply counterproductive disciplinary enforcer
Legal Framework Article 15 (4) and 16 (2) UEFA Disciplinary Regulations; Article 38 UEFA Safety and Security Regulations.
Decision
The CEDB however recalled that all incidents were admitted by the club. The club merely refers to its proper preparation of the match, not presenting any explanations which would undermine the presumed accuracy of the official reports. Regarding the chants and the club’s argument about the fact that UEFA is party accused and judge in these proceedings, the CEDB decided that the argument has no merit insofar. Finally, with regard to the nature of the chant, the CEDB has no doubt that the content is not fit for a sport´s event. CEDB can´t accept that anyone or any institution is compared to a criminal organization, such as it is the mafia, on the basis of a justifiable criticism. Having the above in mind, as well as the club’s previous record, the CEDB deems that a fine € 79´000 is the adequate disciplinary measure.
Chairman: Partl Thomas (AUT)
Vice-Chairmen:
Berzi Sándor (HUN)
Hansen Jim Stjerne (DEN)
Members:
Antenen Jacques (SUI)
Gea Tomás (AND)
Leal João (POR)
Lorenz Hans (GER)
Řepka Rudolf (CZE)
Wolff Joël (LUX)
on Thursday, 16 November 2017. Posted in Sports, Football, Cases, Articles, Regulation & Governance
UK Anti-Doping Releases Findings into its Cycling Investigation
Is Bridge a sport for VAT purposes? The ECJ's decision in English Bridge Union v. HMRC
Published Tuesday, 14 November 2017.
INTERPOL Integrity in Sport Bi-Weekly Bulletin - 31 October - 13 November 2017
ASADA issues peptide warning
Retired Weightlifting Athlete Vargas, Medical Director Merrens Join USADA Board of Directors
U.S. Volleyball Athlete Alexandra Klineman Accepts Finding of No Fault for Anti-Doping Rule Violation
FIFA and FIFPro sign landmark agreement and announce measures to enhance professional football
Sports broadcasting & the extent of mandatory sharing laws in India: A review of Union of India v. BCCI
Published Thursday, 02 November 2017.
Ezekiel Elliott back on the bench as suspension reinstated
2018 Winter Olympians and Paralympians Unite Behind #MyMoment to Defend Clean Athletes’ Irreplaceable Moments
Premiership Rugby and England Rugby join forces with Stonewall to promote LGBT inclusion
INTERPOL Integrity in Sport Bi-Weekly Bulletin - 16-30 October 2017
The Sport Consultancy Legal expands with senior appointment
The lifecycle of an international athlete: Part 9 – Key tips on renovating or building a home
Published Monday, 30 October 2017.
Florida law professor requests argument before court on sports betting
CEO opening statement to Senate Estimates
Campaigning for equality and recognition of human rights in sport - Episode 57
BHA seeks rule change on anti-doping penalties
Arka Gdynia (throwing of objects; setting off of fireworks; stairways blocked; insufficient organization), Decision of 22 November 2017, UEFA Decision
Circumstances of the case
According to the official reports of the UEFA Europa League 2017/2018 match between Arka Gydnia and FC Midtjylland on 27 July 2017, Arka Gdynia’s supporters ignited an extremely large number of fireworks and a cap of flare was thrown on the pitch from the South Stand by the home supporter. The UEFA delegate also reported that away fans standing blocked the stairways the whole match in lower sector. The Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body (CEDB) considered that the large number of fireworks during the match shows that the body searching was unsatisfactory. The CEDB decided on 17 August 2017 that a fine of €60’000 was the adequate disciplinary measure to be imposed on the club. Arka Gdynia appealed the decision stating that there are sufficient mitigating circumstances to impose a maximum sanction amounting to €30’000 or any other lower fine than €60’000.
Legal framework Article 16 (1) of the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations. Article 16 (2) (b) and (c) of the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations. Article 38 UEFA Safety and Security Regulations.
Decision
On 17 August 2017, the CEDB decided to fine Arka Gdynia €60,000. The Appeals Body decided to partially admit the appeal lodged by Arka Gydnia and thus, the CEDB’s decision of 17 August 2017 is amended and Arka Gydnia was imposed a fine of € 50,000 for the setting of fireworks, the throwing of objects and the blocking of stairways. The Appeals Body decided that the club must not be held responsible for an inadequate body searching during the match and dropped the charges for the insufficient body searching. The Appeals Body considered although is true that the high amount of fireworks ignited during the match speaks for a negligent attitude in this regard, the burden of proof that there was an inappropriate body searching lies on UEFA and the delegate didn´t mention that the body search was badly implemented. The Appeals Body considered that there might be other reasons allowing the entrance of fireworks inside the stadium.
Chairman: Pedro Tomás (Spain)
Members:
Michael Maessen (Netherlands)
Björn Ahlberg (Sweden)
on Wednesday, 22 November 2017. Posted in Sports, Football, Cases, Articles, Regulation & Governance
Result of an Appeal (G. Gibbons) heard by the Appeal Board on Monday 20 November 2017
Student-athletes square up against lone objector to attorneys fee award in $209 million NCAA settlement
Cycling, doping & the importance of due process: A review of the Karl Murray case
Published Monday, 20 November 2017.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport rejects an application for urgent provisional measures filed by Adrien Silva
Everton FC (Aggressions by supporters against players, referees). Decision of 16th November 2017, UEFA Decision
Circumstances of the case
The referee of the match reported that he “he was told by the Lyon Goalkeeper, Anthony Lopes, that he was pushed or touched by a spectator from the home crowd in the brawl between players in minute 64.” The club stressed that it was not negligent in any way in relation to the organization of the match, stressing that it does not tolerate any form of aggressive behavior from the side of its supporters. The club also argues that it fully complied with all rules and regulations regarding safety and security at the match, particularly with regard to the deployment of stewards. In the incident at hand, the stewards reacted quickly and efficiently. Finally, the club held that the supporter was identified by the police and might be facing criminal charges as well as a life ban from the stadium.
Legal Framework Article 16 (2) UEFA Disciplinary Regulations.
Decision
The CEDB on a preliminary note took into account the video footage of the incident from which it can be seen how the players of both teams engage in a confrontation behind and on the goalline, close to the stands behind the goal. During said confrontation the spectators who are sitting and standing at the scene, scream, yell and gesticulate in the direction of the players, while one home-team supporter who is apparently holding a young child on his arm throws a punch at one player from the visiting team. It goes without saying that such images are more than shocking and cannot be tolerated. The CEDB emphasized that in any case, there should never be a moment when players on the pitch engage in violent altercations, but this goes even more for spectators during a match. According to Article 8 DR, which stipulates the principle of "strict liability", and Article 16 (2) DR, which builds on this principle, a club is to be held responsible for the improper conduct of its supporters, even if it might not be at fault itself. In light of the foregoing, the CEDB decided that the club is to be held responsible for the improper conduct of its supporters in accordance with Article 16 (2) (h) DR and needed to be punished with a fine of €30’000.
Chairman: Partl Thomas (AUT)
Vice-Chairmen:
Berzi Sándor (HUN)
Hansen Jim Stjerne (DEN)
Members:
Antenen Jacques (SUI)
Gea Tomás (AND)
Leal João (POR)
Lorenz Hans (GER)
Řepka Rudolf (CZE)
Wolff Joël (LUX)
on Thursday, 16 November 2017. Posted in Sports, Football, Cases, Articles, Regulation & Governance
eSports and UK tax law – key points for teams, players & events organisers
Published Wednesday, 15 November 2017.
Powerful partnership to tackle improper PED prescriptions
Results of Enquiries (J. Candlish, M. Moubarak) heard by the Disciplinary Panel on Thursday 9 November 2017
FK Austria Wien (Improper conduct of supporters; setting off of fireworks; kit infringement), Decision of 10 November 2017, UEFA Decision
Circumstances of the case
Three incidents were reported by the UEFA match delegate: 1) Kit infringement: one of the players from Austria Wien had a track suit with advertising VERBAND on the back. 2) Incorrect behavior of supporters: In the 42nd minute a supporter managed to climb up on the roof of the fence of the South Tribune. He was taken by the police and kept by the police until the end of the match. He was fined by the police. 3) Setting off of fireworks: 4 Bengal lights were lit by Austria supporters in sector 3 in the South Tribune, behind the goal, when the players entered the pitch before kickoff of the first half, approximately 3 mins before the start of the match. The club admits the kit infringement and explains that the player was not aware of the information regarding clothing containing sponsors print. Likewise, the club admits that its supporter climbed the fence and held that, in the future, it will inform the stewards to pay special attention to ensure it does not happen again. Concerning the pyrotechnics the club noted that a great number of supporters entered the stadium without control from a part of the sector next to the away stand.
Legal Framework Article 16 (2) UEFA Disciplinary Regulations, Article 60.04 and 31.03 UEFA Kit Regulations, Article 55.01 UEFA Europa League Regulations.
Decision
The CEDB noted that all three violations of the UEFA Disciplinary Regulations and the UEFA Kit Regulations were admitted by the club and it only remained for the Panel to find the appropriate sanction. In the present case, the CEDB identified and took into account the seriousness and multiplicity of the offences committed, the improper conduct of the club’s supporters, the kit infringement, the setting off of fireworks as well as the club’s previous record, noting that FK Austria Wien has already been punished for setting off of fireworks on numerous occasions. Overall, the CEDB deemed that a fine of €7’000 was appropriate for the setting off of fireworks and the improper conduct of its supporters, whereas a warning was warranted for the kit infringement.
Ad-hoc-Chairman: Hansen Jim Stjerne (DEN)
on Friday, 10 November 2017. Posted in Sports, Football, Cases, Articles, Regulation & Governance
Latest decisions by AFC judicial bodies published
Powerlifting Athlete Suspended for Presence of Stimulants
Two Australians added to Prohibited Association List
UFC Athlete Brandon Moreno Accepts Finding of No Fault for Anti-Doping Policy Violation
Sports Tribunal Decision DFSNZ v Karl Murray
AAA Panel Imposes Two-Year Sanction on Weightlifting Athlete Amy Hay for Doping Violation
ITTF Decides on Sanctions for Chinese Trio for China Open Forfeits
Must athletes prove how a banned substance entered their body to establish lack of intention?
Published Tuesday, 31 October 2017.