IOC elects former United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to head its Ethics Commission
A guide to Germany’s new criminal law against betting fraud and match-fixing in sports
Published Thursday, 14 September 2017.
New reforms launched to improve ownership experience through simplified administration
Decision in the case of Jamie Burdekin
In-house Counsel Forum to take place at 2017 LawInSport Conference
How can instruments of good governance reduce corruption in global sport?
Latest trends and developments in sports media rights to be discussed at LawInSport Conference
Is an overhaul of the anti-doping regime overdue?
What are the current opportunities and challenges that sports betting brings to global sport?
Athlete development and welfare to be discussed by experts at LawInSport 3rd Annual Conference
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) dismisses the appeals filed by the Bolivian Football Federation
U.S. wheelchair basketball athlete, Sarah Heinzl, accepts public warning for anti-doping rule violation
The lifecycle of an international athlete: Part 1 - finding an agent & signing with a sports club
Published Monday, 28 August 2017.
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) decision in the case of Therese Johaug: 18-month suspension
GNK Dinamo (Setting off of fireworks; racist behaviour), Decision of 25 August 2017, UEFA Decision
Circumstances of the case
The CEDB noted that the GNK Dinamo supporters displayed a banner in east stand with a "Celtic-cross". Likewise, approximately in the 46th minute into the game, several hundred of the club’s supporters started chanting “Mamiću, cigane, odlazi iz svetinje!” (Translation: “Mamić, you gypsy, get out of our shrine”). The chant was repeated several times during the 46th and 48th minutes into the game. Also six fireworks were lit by the club’s supporters. The club stated regarding the Celtic cross that this was the first time that its supporters have displayed such banner and that as soon as the UEFA Security Officer has noticed the banner and informed, the club’s security officer removed it. Regarding the chants directed against Mr. Mamic, the club explained that this is still used by the group of ultras as an expression of fight against the club’s ex-president, Mr. Zdravko Mamic and that this is not a case of classic racism.
Legal framework Article 16 (2) UEFA Disciplinary Regulations; Article 14 UEFA Disciplinary Regulations.
Decision
Regarding the Celtic cross, the CEDB that this is a symbol used by neo-Nazis worldwide and denotes “the supremacy of the white race”, i.e. a clearly racist symbol. AS regards the chants, the CEDB recalls that the Court of Arbitration for Sport already had the opportunity to examine the nature of this chant in the light of Article 14 DR. It concluded that the chant was of a racist nature. Briefly, supporters by using the term “gypsy” in an insulting manner denigrated hereby an ethnic group, thereby also violating Art. 14 DR. Since this case concerns a first infringement of Article 14(1) DR, the CEDB decided that the Club shall be punished with a partial stadium closure, as provided for in Article 14(2) DR. For the setting off of fireworks, the club was punished with a fine of €5’000.
Chairman: Partl Thomas (AUT)
Vice-Chairman: Berzi Sándor (HUN)
Member: Larumbe Beain Kepa (ESP)
on Friday, 25 August 2017. Posted in Sports, Football, Cases, Articles, Regulation & Governance
Trends in digital brand engagement, image rights and sponsorship deals in sport
An in depth analysis of the 2017 Australian Cricket Pay Dispute
Published Friday, 18 August 2017.
Should cross code conduct be considered in mitigation in rugby disciplinary cases? The Sonny Bill Williams decision
Published Thursday, 17 August 2017.
KKS Lech Poznan (Setting off of fireworks) Decision of 17 August 2017, UEFA Decision
Circumstances of the case
It was reported by the UEFA match delegate that the KKS Lech Poznań supporters lit around 45 Bengal lights in the 47th minute of the match at the exact same time. The club stated that it is disappointed by the behavior of this small group of supporters, however underlining that the incident did not result in any significant disturbance of the game, such as game stoppage or reduction of the TV coverage and that none of these Bengal lights were thrown.
Legal framework Article 16 (2) UEFA Disciplinary Regulations.
Decision
The CEDB referred to the principle of strict liability enshrined in Art. 8 and 16 (2) DR, noting that the club did not put forward any arguments in the present case which would breach the accuracy of the official UEFA report which expressly refers to the setting off of fireworks and is presumed to be accurate under Article 45 DR. The club merely referred to circumstances like that no major incidents derived from the ignition of the fireworks that are irrelevant for the assessment of the incident. The CEDB further recalled the previous record of the club, the very high number of fireworks and the potential risks created by doing so at the occasion of an away-match, and though that a fine of €30’000 and banning the club from selling tickets it its supporters for the next UEFA competition away match is the appropriate sanction.
Chairman: Partl Thomas (AUT)
Vice-Chairman: Hansen Jim Stjerne (DEN)
Members:
Antenen Jacques (SUI)
Gea Tomás (AND)
Leal João (POR)
Lorenz Hans (GER)
Wolff Joël (LUX)
on Thursday, 17 August 2017. Posted in Sports, Football, Cases, Articles, Regulation & Governance
Enquiries (R. Bastiman, P. Hobbs and G. Kelleway) heard by the Disciplinary Panel on Thursday 10 August 2017
The legal implications for big data, sports analytics and player metrics under the GDPR
Published Tuesday, 15 August 2017.
Top of the league: How football clubs protect and exploit their brands in a global marketplace
Published Friday, 11 August 2017.
Karl-Heinz Rummenigge not running for re-election as ECA Chairman
Interview with Takuya Yamazaki - the challenges for football players rights in Asia - Episode 53
Jarrod Poort Whereabouts violation
'An Apple Watch in play to keep the pitcher at bay’: Major League Baseball’s latest cheating scandal
Published Tuesday, 12 September 2017.
The lifecycle of an international athlete: Part 2 – Key immigration issues when entering the UK
Published Monday, 11 September 2017.
Who has jurisdiction over international football transfer disputes?
Published Saturday, 02 September 2017.
The legal challenges of working with sports analytics and big data
Trends in sports law education for lawyers, professionals, athletes and students
How can brands protect value in today’s digital world?
Should there be a minimum target for minority groups to be represented on sport boards?
Showtime on the ropes for livestream trouble during Mayweather-McGregor fight
Jason Holder reprimanded for breaching ICC Code of Conduct
Experts to discuss legal issues in eSports at LawInSport 3rd Annual Conference
INTERPOL Integrity in Sport Bi-Weekly Bulletin - 7-20 August 2017
The obstacles to UFC fighters’ unionisation
Published Saturday, 26 August 2017.
U.S. weightlifting athlete, Zack Herbert, accepts sanction for anti-doping rule violation
A brief review of China’s new 100% ‘transfer tax’ on footballers
Published Friday, 25 August 2017.
Rebuilding trust in athletics: An interview with Brett Clothier - Head of the Athletics Integrity Unit - Episode 52
Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) imposes four-year ban on Anna Pyatykh
Legia Warszawa (Setting off of fireworks; illicit banner), Decision of 17 August 2017, UEFA Decision
Circumstances of the case
It was reported by the UEFA match delegate that the Legia Warszawa supporters staged an antiUEFA protest about 30 minutes before kick-off, unfurling a banner making reference to the €35’000 fine imposed on the club by UEFA. As the teams entered the pitch, a large banner was displayed implying that UEFA are pigs, additionally holding up blow-up plastic pigs. As the teams entered the pitch, a large amount of flares were ignited on either side of the banner. It was impossible to count the number, but it was more than likely to be in excess of 50.
Legal framework Article 16 (2) UEFA Disciplinary Regulations
Decision
With regards to the banner, the CEDB takes this opportunity to recall, that it cannot allow football matches organized by UEFA to become forums for people who want to abuse the game’s popularity to publicize their political or religious opinions. The CEDB further recalled that the setting off fireworks is a serious offence because not only can it disrupt the orderly running of the match but also, and more importantly, it can endanger the physical integrity of the persons who are lighting the fireworks, other spectators, officials and even the players on the pitch. In view of the long previous record of the club and the very negative picture and attitude of both the club supporters and the club itself, who is not able or willing to face a dramatic situation relating to the attitude of its supporters and to accept to comply with the UEFA disciplinary measures imposed against it, the CEDB deems that a partial closure and a fine €50´000 shall be deemed as the adequate disciplinary measures.
Chairman: Partl Thomas (AUT)
Vice-Chairman: Berzi Sándor (HUN)
Member: Larumbe Beain Kepa (ESP)
on Thursday, 17 August 2017. Posted in Sports, Football, Cases, Articles, Regulation & Governance
Why sport needs a unified approach to sanctions for corruption offences
Published Wednesday, 16 August 2017.
Result of an Enquiry (P. McBride) heard by the Disciplinary Panel on Thursday 10 August 2017
An interview with Maacah Scott, Staff Counsel at Arizona Diamondbacks - Episode 51
FC Viktoria Plzen (Direct Red Card; Throwing of objects; Stairways blocked; improper conduct of the team) Decision of 11 August 2017, UEFA Decision
Circumstances of the case
FC Viktoria Plzeň supporters blocked stairways in the North stand during the Match and a plastic cup was thrown onto the pitch by one of the club’s supporters in the North stand in the 78th minute of the Match. Also, the club’s player Krmencik Michal (the “Player”) was dismissed by the referee because he “hit with his arm using excessive force against the face of his opponent”. In addition, eight (8) yellow cards were issued to the Club’s players by the referee. In its statement, the club suggests that the throwing of objects was not serious and claims that the delegate’s report is confusing as regards the duration of the blocked stairways
Legal framework Article 16 (2) UEFA Disciplinary Regulations, Article 6 of the UEFA Anti-Doping Regulations
Decision
Regarding the red card, the CEDB noted that hitting an opponent in the face is obviously very dangerous and that Player was clearly reckless in his actions, which constitutes an assault (Art. 15 (1) (e) DR) and decided to punish the player with a three-match suspension. With regard to the throwing of objects and the blocking of stairways the CEDB noted that the club did not provide any evidence which would proof the inaccuracy of the official reports and thought, also taking into account the improper conduct of the team, that a fine of €28’000 is the appropriate sanction.
Chairman: Partl Thomas (AUT)
on Friday, 11 August 2017. Posted in Sports, Football, Cases, Articles, Regulation & Governance