Young and in demand: The legality of buy-out clauses in Spanish football contracts
Published Friday, 27 October 2017.
Taxation of image rights in Australia: Key points for athletes from the Brisbane Lions decision
Published Thursday, 26 October 2017.
Genius Sports and DreamHack sign major data rights and integrity partnership
New replay technology deployed for the first time on QIPCO British Champions Day
ESIC launches online anti-corruption education tutorial
The legal status of fantasy football in Great Britain
Published Friday, 20 October 2017.
IOC Launches a new approach to the candidature process for the Olympic Winter Games 2026
World Rugby appoints IMG as global master licensee
Key changes in WADA’s 2018 Prohibited List: IVs & Gene Doping
Published Friday, 13 October 2017.
Join leading sports lawyers and executives at the British Association for Sport and Law Conference 2017
WADA Executive Committee ratifies Board Membership for Independent Testing Authority
U.S. Paralympic track & field athlete, Shaquille Vance, accepts sanction for anti-doping rule violation
WADA lifts partial suspension of UCLA Laboratory’s accreditation
The appeal filed by high jumper Anna Chicherova dismissed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
Tapping-up (tampering) of sports players: How the NBA rules compare to the English Premier League
Published Tuesday, 03 October 2017.
WADA urges States Parties to renew their pledge to Clean Sportat 6th UNESCO Conference of Parties
On behalf of the MCC: New changes to MCC’s Laws of Cricket come into effect for first time
Athletics athlete suspended for the presence of cannabis
Important changes to The FA’s Regulations on Intermediaries
Published Friday, 29 September 2017.
CAS rules on the case Jersey Football Association vs UEFA
Annamarie Phelps CBE to speak at 2017 BASL Conference
Duty of Care in Sport: Making the case for a Sports Ombudsman in the UK
Published Tuesday, 26 September 2017.
UFC athlete, Nick Roehrick, accepts sanction for anti-doping policy violation
WADA Executive Committee focuses on long-term budget plans, compliance monitoring and its global headquarters
Sporting Clube de Portugal (Direct Red Card), Decision of 27 October 2017, UEFA Decision
Circumstances of the case
The player wearing number 10 of Sporting Clube de Portugal, Borges Cabral Jovane Eduardo, in the 63rd minute, after a foul of a player of Juventus while the player of Juventus was still on the ground trying to get up, slapped him with an open hand on the back of the head. The referee sent off Borges Cabral Jovane Eduardo for violent conduct.
Legal framework Article 15 (1) (e) UEFA Disciplinary Regulations.
Decision
The CEDB deems that this is a highly aggressive act, threatening serious injury. It has nothing to do with the game and is simply a hostile act of physical violence. Consequently, the act of the player who struck the opponent player in the back on his head as described by the referee constitutes assault under the terms of Article 15 (1) (e) DR and shall be punished accordingly, in this case, considering the circumstances of the case, with a three match suspension.
Chairman: Partl Thomas (AUT)
Vice-Chairman: Hansen Jim Stjerne (DEN)
Member: Antenen Jacques (SUI)
on Friday, 27 October 2017. Posted in Sports, Football, Cases, Articles, Regulation & Governance
Indian Sports Law : Insights from the Sports Law & Policy Symposium 2017 - Episode 54
IAAF successful in CAS appeal against French Athletics Federation and Mr Riad Guerfi
Football helmet maker fends off another concussion-related lawsuit
UFC athlete Carlos Felipe accepts sanction for anti-doping policy violation
CEV Partner Sportrader gets Champions League Volleyball across Asia and Africa with two significant deals
Key tips for sports brands on tackling counterfeiting and grey goods
Published Thursday, 19 October 2017.
Paris Saint-Germain (Stairways blocked; Late Kick-off; Improper conduct of officials; Setting off of fireworks), Decision of 19 October 2017, UEFA Decision
Circumstances of the case
Home-club supporters in several sectors were blocking the stairways during whole match. Before kick-off, home supporters lit three flares. Late kick-off of 2min30secs, due to the fact that the home team left the dressing room late. They were also late in the second half (2mins). The club argues that ultra-supporters occupied the sectors in which the stairways were blocked, emphasizing that that people could circulate, causing no blocking. Regarding the setting off fireworks, the club insists that it was an isolated incident occurring before the match. The security responsible acted immediately and recover the fireworks. With regard to the late kick-off infringement, the medical staff had to intervene to treat the player Neymar.” The club further rejects the responsibility of the coach in this kind of incidents as the principle of strict liability is not design to cover also such situations.
Legal Framework Article 38 Safety and Security Regulations; Article 11 (2) UEFA Disciplinary Regulations; Article 16 (2) UEFA Disciplinary Regulations
Decision
With regard to the fireworks, the CEDB noted that the club did not put forward any arguments which would breach the accuracy of the official UEFA report which expressly refers to the setting off of fireworks and is presumed to be accurate under Article 45 DR. The CEDB noted the same with regard to the blocking of stairways, stressing that the efforts made by the club are to be expected since they merely constitute the club’s obligations pertaining to Art. 38 SSR. As regards the late kick-off, the CEDB stressed that respect needs to be paid to the nature of the UEFA Champions League, UEFA’s flagship club competition, and that clubs needs to respect the principle of equal treatment and opportunities, as both teams are entitled to and need to be given the same duration of preparation prior to the match. The CEDB is willing to accept the arguments of the club as regards the lack of responsibility of his head coach with regard to the late kick off infringement and the injury of one of the players. In this particular case, the CEDB is comfortable satisfied that only the club shall be held responsible for the late kick-off of its team. Regarding the three mentioned infringements, the CEDB took into account the previous record of the club with regard to all three infringements and deemed that a fine of €40’000 is the appropriate sanction.
Chairman: Partl Thomas (AUT)
Vice-Chairman: Hansen Jim Stjerne (DEN)
Members:
Antenen Jacques (SUI)
Wolff Joël (LUX)
Gea Tomás (AND)
Hans Lorenz (GER)
Larumbe Beain Kepa (ESP)
Joao Leal (POR)
on Thursday, 19 October 2017. Posted in Sports, Football, Cases, Articles, Regulation & Governance
INTERPOL Integrity in Sport Bi-Weekly Bulletin - 2-16 October 2017
AFC recognises Nepal police for assistance to combat match fixing
New International Test and ODI Leagues agreed in principle by ICC members
Pennsylvania high school students’ concussion class action allowed to proceed
How football Intermediaries are regulated in the Netherlands: The role of ProAgent
Published Wednesday, 11 October 2017.
How the collective sale of broadcasting rights works in Turkish football
Published Friday, 06 October 2017.
Summer 2017 football transfer window to be discussed at BASL conference
WADA publishes 2018 List of Prohibited Substances and Methods
BHA survey to measure perceptions and confidence around integrity in British racing
Membership of British racing’s first-ever diversity steering group finalised
INTERPOL Integrity in Sport Bi-Weekly Bulletin - 19 September - 2 October 2017
David Lappartient elected UCI President
Bribery scandal rocks the NCAA
5 key English contract law principles that every sports lawyer should know
Published Thursday, 28 September 2017.